Build vs. Buy in 2025: The Decision Framework That Actually Works

The build vs. buy decision has never been more complex. SaaS options have multiplied. Low-code platforms promise rapid delivery. AI can generate code faster than ever. Meanwhile, technical debt from past buy decisions is strangling organizations, and custom builds are taking twice as long as estimated.

Here's a framework that cuts through the noise.

The Questions That Actually Matter

Most build vs. buy analyses focus on cost. That's necessary but insufficient. The questions that predict success:

Is this a differentiator or a commodity?

If the capability gives you competitive advantage, lean toward building. If it's table stakes that every competitor has, lean toward buying.

Your payroll system is not a differentiator. Buy it. Your pricing algorithm that beats competitors? Build it.

How stable are your requirements?

Stable, well-understood requirements favor buying. If a vendor has solved this problem for 500 companies, you probably don't need a custom solution.

Evolving, uncertain requirements favor building. Vendors can't anticipate where your business is going. Custom software can adapt.

What's your timeline?

If you need it working in 90 days, buy. Enterprise software development takes longer than anyone admits. A vendor can have you live in weeks.

If you have 18 months and the outcome matters for years, building becomes viable.

Do you have the team?

Building requires developers, architects, QA, DevOps. If you don't have them—and can't hire them quickly—you're building with the wrong resources.

Buying requires different skills: vendor evaluation, contract negotiation, integration, change management. Different team, different expertise.

The Hidden Costs of Buying

Vendor pricing is the beginning, not the end:

Integration costs. That SaaS platform needs to connect to your systems. Data mapping, API development, error handling, monitoring. Budget 30-50% of license cost for integration work.

Customization limits. The vendor's 80% solution doesn't cover your 20% edge cases. You'll build workarounds, manual processes, or bolt-on custom code. This creates a maintenance burden that's neither fully custom nor fully vendor-supported.

Vendor dependency. When the vendor changes direction, you change with them—or you migrate. I've seen companies trapped on platforms the vendor is sunsetting, forced into expensive migrations on the vendor's timeline.

Data portability. Getting your data out of a SaaS platform ranges from straightforward to nearly impossible. Before you commit, test the export. If you can't leave, you're not a customer—you're a captive.

Feature bloat. You're paying for capabilities you'll never use. Enterprise vendors add features to justify enterprise pricing. You get complexity you didn't ask for.

The Hidden Costs of Building

Custom development quotes are just the beginning:

The 2x rule. Whatever the initial estimate, double it. Not because developers are bad at estimating—because requirements change, integrations are harder than expected, and scope creeps.

Ongoing maintenance. A custom system needs care. Security patches, dependency updates, bug fixes, performance tuning. Budget 20% of build cost annually for maintenance.

Knowledge concentration. The developers who built it understand it. When they leave, understanding leaves with them. Documentation helps but doesn't solve this.

Opportunity cost. Your developers building custom software aren't building other things. What else could that team deliver if they weren't maintaining this system?

Technical debt accumulation. Every custom system accumulates debt. Without disciplined refactoring, today's asset becomes tomorrow's liability.

The Hybrid Approach

The best solutions often combine both:

Buy the platform, build the differentiators. Use Salesforce for CRM, but build custom integrations that give you unique capabilities. Use Shopify for e-commerce, but build the recommendation engine that outperforms competitors.

Buy for speed, build for scale. Start with a vendor solution to validate the concept. If it proves valuable, rebuild the critical pieces for performance, cost, or customization.

Build the core, buy the periphery. Build your core business logic. Buy authentication (Auth0), payments (Stripe), email (SendGrid). Focus your development effort where it matters most.

The 2025 Landscape Shifts

Several trends are reshaping the calculus:

AI-assisted development. Code generation is accelerating custom development. The build timeline is compressing—though the 2x rule still applies because the hard part was never typing code.

Vertical SaaS maturity. Industry-specific platforms now exist for niches that used to require custom development. Check whether someone has already solved your vertical's common problems.

API-first architecture. Modern platforms are more composable than ever. You can buy components and assemble them into custom configurations. The build/buy line is blurring.

Rising SaaS costs. Vendor pricing is increasing across the board. The long-term cost of buying is higher than historical baselines. This shifts some decisions back toward building.

The Decision Matrix

Score each dimension 1-5:

Sum the scores:

• 6-12: Strong buy signal
• 13-18: Could go either way—dig deeper
• 19-24: Strong build signal

This isn't a formula—it's a framework for structured thinking. The conversation this matrix generates is more valuable than the number.

Making the Call

After 15 years of these decisions, here's my bias: default to buying until you have a compelling reason to build.

Building is hard. It takes longer than expected, costs more than budgeted, and requires capabilities many organizations don't have. The romanticism of custom software rarely survives contact with reality.

But when building is right—when the capability is core to your business, when requirements are unique, when you have the team—building creates assets that appreciate while SaaS costs compound.

The worst outcome is building what you should have bought, or buying what you should have built. Take the time to decide correctly.

If you're facing a build vs. buy decision and want an objective perspective, let's work through it together.

Related Posts

• The Vendor Lock-In Decision Framework
• AI Integration in Enterprise Software: Separating Reality from Hype
• Technical Debt Is a Business Decision, Not a Technical Failure